Scheduled Shift

Employers may use a payroll practice which only pays employees for the time that they are scheduled to work even though the employee may be under the control of the employer prior to their scheduled shift or after their scheduled shift ends.

This practice results in wages which the employer fails to pay the employee for this off-the-clock work.

Federal and state laws generally require an employer to pay a nonexempt employee wages for all the time which he or she works. State laws may create standards which are significantly different from federal requirements for employers regarding payment of wages.

Under federal law, an employer is required to pay an employee for all hours worked. "Hours worked" under federal law means the time during which an employee is required to be on duty or to be on the employer's premises or at a prescribed workplace and all time during which an employee is suffered or permitted to work, whether or not required to do. It is not limited to hours spent in active, productive labor.

In California, "hours worked" means the time during which an employee is required to be on duty or to be on the employer's premises or at a prescribed workplace and all time during which the employer is aware or should be aware the employee is working, whether or not the employer requires the employer to do so.

Working time in California is not limited to hours spent in active, productive labor. It generally includes time that the employee is working but is not subject to the employer's control, including overtime which the employer has not requested or required, as long as the employer should have known the employee was working.

This duty requires an employer to pay employees for off-the-clock work, which is time worked before or after their scheduled shift, if the employer knew or should have known that the employees were working those hours. This may also include time which an employee spends in active labor or under the control of the employer but which the employer improperly shaves that time from an employee's hours worked by automatic deduction of meal periods or by "rounding" practices.

A complex set of federal and state statutes govern payment of wages. Federal law sets the minimum standards for an employer, but state laws may create higher standards. Numerous exceptions exist which alter an employer's duties for payment of wages. To navigate the complex statutes regarding payment of wages, an employee needs to speak to an experienced attorney who is familiar with the law in this area.

If you believe that your employer has failed to follow the law in payment of your wages, contact Lavi & Ebrahimian, LLP, today for a free consultation. Our experienced employment attorneys will evaluate your options under the law and can help you obtain the most complete relief possible.